Blog

he topic of revenue sharing has been the hottest thing this season with the House vs NCAA case nearing a resolution. However, as things looked to be on their way to a settlement, the DOJ and Department of Education stepped in to slow things down

Among the most vocal critics of the settlement are athletes from Stanford and Temple, each raising distinct yet interconnected concerns. Their objections highlight overarching themes of inadequate compensation, lack of representation, and lingering NCAA control over athlete finances.

It’s easy to assume that a college with a low acceptance rate must be an elite institution offering the best possible education. But as application numbers soar and admit rates plummet, it’s important to recognize that selectivity does not necessarily equal quality

guidance mandates that schools ensure gender equity in all athletic opportunities and benefits, including NIL-related compensation. It challenges the traditional financial models many institutions had in place and raises significant questions about compliance in this new era.

Our Co-Founder and Lead Advisor, Reid Meyer, joined Katie Andersen on the College Bound Mentor Podcast this past week to discuss athletic recruiting.